|
Post by ChuckDiesel on Oct 21, 2007 6:07:30 GMT -5
How's about a ruling from the hierarchy here about simmed games? 1. Is it okay for the winning owner of a simmed game to allow for the losing owner (most likely a new, different owner) to play the game for real? As long as it's up to the winning owner since he's under no obligation to risk the loss? 2. If there is no current owner, is it okay to find someone else who can take the other team and play the game out? Simmed games SUCK!
|
|
|
Post by Commish on Oct 21, 2007 7:20:51 GMT -5
Yes and yes chuck.. i was going to fill the openings one last time then start filling the new openings with current owners....but i may just move right into using current owners. Also, i am thinking of getting volunteers to take over a second team to play out the rest of the season.
|
|
|
Post by tdogg on Dec 13, 2007 20:25:57 GMT -5
I stil say there should just be replacement players for a week. give people 2 weeks to play their games if they dont get them then they play a substitue. and since your a great commish if the other guy can play later than let him make up game if not then leave it alone
|
|