|
Post by Poundtherock on Aug 18, 2004 11:23:02 GMT -5
I played my first 4-minute game yesterday and lost 7-14. The game seemed like it was longer than 5 minutes! I totally enjoyed the game with Timmy! I guess it must be disheartening for those looking for those 66-0 games. What do you think? Is 4 minutes good or what?
|
|
|
Post by gregobomb84 on Aug 18, 2004 14:51:34 GMT -5
I think 5 is perfect
with 4 the guys don't get realistic tackles.
The only thing with 5 minutes quarters are high scoring games but not all are that way. Just the good guys.
I get happy when Henry has over 80 rushing yards
|
|
|
Post by Poundtherock on Aug 19, 2004 1:03:10 GMT -5
After reviewing game film yesterday from my game with Timmy, 5 minutes would have been better. ;D
|
|
|
Post by timmypg on Aug 19, 2004 5:09:17 GMT -5
I liked 4 minutes. Give PTR 4 more minutes and I might have lost. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Poundtherock on Aug 19, 2004 12:27:26 GMT -5
Don't shortchange yourself, Timmy.
|
|
|
Post by LiLPetragz45 on Aug 19, 2004 18:52:57 GMT -5
4 isn't as bad as I thought it would be, but 5 is definetly better...
You will have more time to establish a running game instead of having a ton of pass attempts and maybe 10 rushing attempts... it's just more realistic.
|
|
|
Post by Commish on Aug 19, 2004 19:59:39 GMT -5
We will be going 5 Min Q's.
|
|
|
Post by Poundtherock on Aug 19, 2004 23:14:57 GMT -5
The only drawback to this is no stat tracking emails nor will any of your game stats be held online. I kind of liked those features. EA will not track anything unless it is a 4-minute game, so online leagues are out, correct?
Yep!
|
|